home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: mail2news.demon.co.uk!sahaja.demon.co.uk
- From: Christopher Fynn <cfynn@sahaja.demon.co.uk>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc
- Subject: Re: C++ with Zapp vs. Delphi
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 96 08:29:03 GMT
- Message-ID: <822126543snz@sahaja.demon.co.uk>
- References: <4coar6$d4n@sun4.bham.ac.uk> <4coip7$69s@news1.usa.pipeline.com> <DBk8wg2yqjbB083yn@iaccess.za> <4d7pmb$48c8@tigger.cc.uic.edu> <4dco3d$cs8@ozramp.ozramp.net.au> <4dk53n$6pu@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au>
- Reply-To: cfynn@sahaja.demon.co.uk
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: sahaja.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.29
- X-Mail2News-Path: sahaja.demon.co.uk
-
- In article <4dk53n$6pu@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au>
- mazz@faceng.newcastle.edu.au "Richard Mazzaferri" writes:
- <Snip>
-
- > The bottom line is how quick the job is to complete (including the full
- > life cycle: clients changing their requirements, bug fixing and
- > maintenance.) Delphi wins hands down, no contest, no other competitor in
- > sight. C++ is not even close. And the best thing is that you can still
- > use C++ in DLLs to do parts of the application that _really_ need to be
- > done in C++.
- >
- > Of course, I shouldn't be telling you all this. The fewer people who know
- > the rapid development strategies, the less able the competition is :-)
-
- Yes - lets everyone stop telling others how great Delphi is.
- That may not be so good for Borland - but it will help us
- all keep ahead of the competition. Besides which we won't
- have to waste time in these almost religious "language-war"
- discussions.
-
- - Chris
-
- --
- Christopher J Fynn <cfynn@sahaja.demon.co.uk>
-